Skip to main content

AHA 126th Annual Meeting: Chicago, Day One

Thursday, January 5, 2012 

After a pleasant enough flight from Houston to Chicago I arrived at O’Hare in the AM, took Chicago’s El trains to the Magnificent Mile shopping district just north of the Chicago River and checked in to my hotel.  Everything was smooth, no major commute or registration hassles.   
After registering at the conference I strolled up Michigan Avenue to the Newberry Library, one of the most extensive independent research institutions in the nation.  This privately funded archive and library is open to the public for scholarly and genealogic research.  I spent two hours with the library catalog and read a few documents from the 1820s to 1840s that are related to my own research on antebellum Kentucky.  I expected the Library would be overcrowded because of the AHA Meeting, but the reading rooms were very comfortable and the staff were pleasant and quick to pull the manuscripts for me.  (Thanks especially to Lisa and Meagan)

The first panel that I attended of the weekend, hosted by the Newberry, focused on Native American experiences in the War of 1812.  This anniversary year will see a series of events commemorating and critically rethinking the conflict and the city of Chicago is a particularly great place for that endeavor considering its role in the war.  The AHA is global in focus, so there do not appear to be many more 1812 panels this weekend, although I expect my summer trip to Baltimore for a 19th century meeting to give much more attention to the War.

The panel, Perspectives on the War of 1812 from the Collections of the Newberry Library highlighted the scholarship derived from sources collected by the Library.  Susan Sleeper-Smith spoke about the role of women in the wars and treaties of the Old Northwest and Illinois leading up to 1812.  Gregory Dowd’s presentation noted and gently chastised modern scholars for taking for granted racialized, antebellum associations of southern Indians and cosmological superstition.  According to a small number of 19th century southern commentators, Tecumseh’s pan-Indian missionary efforts to the Creeks depended upon “paranormal” associations that Creeks made with the presence of a rare comet in 1811 and subsequent earthquakes.  Dowd’ asserts that the sources, sequence of events, and racially dismissive if not patronizing accounts by southern whites make it unsatisfactory at best, wrong at worst, to attribute Creek militancy to meteorological events.  Scott Manning Stevens, a Mohawk scholar from a reservation divided between the US and Canada, on the New York/Ontario/Quebec boundaries, discussed the very present legacy of the border and reservation for the Iroquois people.  The other two panelists provided useful and enlightening commentary on early map making in the Chicago area of the 1790s to the 1810s using maps and atlases held in the Newberry Library.


Popular posts from this blog

Weekend Reading? Trump as Jackson Think Pieces Galore

14th Amendment

Today is the anniversary of the passage of the 14th Amendment in 1868 which guarantees birthright citizenship in the United States.

Passed in both houses of Congress by June 1866 it took more than two years to be ratified by the states.  Every former Confederate state opposed its ratification until Congress made it a condition for readmission to the Union and the seating of southern Congressmen.  Citizenship for freedmen and women in the South opened the possibility of African American men voting and holding office, something anticipated eagerly by the Republican party, depicted here on the cover of Harper's Weekly as the amendment gained support throughout 1867.

Not everyone, of course, welcomed African American votes, particularly California Democrats who would soon push for the closure of Asian immigration to the state out of fear that the 14th Amendment would make citizens of the children of immigrants.  Below is a typical anti-Republican cartoon trading on anxieties about the 1…

The Countess, Clara Bow, and Women Boxers of the 1920s

I've long admired the Depression era reporting of Joseph Mitchell, as well as his later essays for the New Yorker.  The book to read, I suppose, is his Up in the Old Hotel.  I have been working my way through a late 1930s collection of pieces entitled My Ears Are Bent which collects his various- probably many unprinted- reports on Prohibition era NYC's underworld.

In a section on sports, Mitchell's clear admiration and affection for the plucky 1920s women boxers is matched only perhaps by his discussion of the performance pushed into burlesque as vaudeville audiences declined during the depression.

In an endearing profile he describes the 1930s career of The Countess, Jeanne Vina La Marr, the first woman in America licensed to fight in New Jersey in the mid1920s.  Unable to fight contests without a license in NYC, she instead did exhibition in the city, often fighting other women and men, usually in some vaguely legal connection with the burlesque shows and speakeasies.